What type of feedback can improve interpreting skills post-session?

Constructive feedback from peers or supervisors is essential for improving interpreting skills after a session. This type of feedback is specific, actionable, and focuses on areas where an interpreter can enhance their performance. Peers and supervisors can provide insights based on their own experiences and training, which helps in identifying strengths and areas for improvement. They can offer guidance on interpreting techniques, accuracy, and cultural nuances that may have been overlooked during the session.

In contrast, other forms of feedback, such as general comments from friends, tend to be vague and may not provide the detailed, professional insights necessary for growth in interpreting. Unsolicited advice from bystanders may not be relevant and can instead introduce confusion, as it often lacks context or understanding of the interpreting process. Feedback based solely on personal feelings may not address specific skills or competencies, making it less effective for professional development. Constructive input fosters a more focused approach to learning, thereby enhancing overall interpreting abilities.